Thanks, you are better documented than the average
The tracking info is fuzzy enough to be inconclusive, but, it shows effort, as expected
A reflector does not need an astronaut to be put there
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon
we will not know the truth until it is possible to have new images + video of the landing sites
I can wait
Have a nice day
A reflector does not need an astronaut to be put there
it still needs a lander to place it?
new images + video of the landing sites
they have been coming in for years? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
The point is having a manned mission, it is fairly simple to have a robotic mission to place a reflector
Going to mars is "simple" if no humans are involved
As far as I can read from the article there are people claiming to have tracked, received, supposedly pictures at such low resolution that .... whatever, it does not change my life, nor yours.
The first two photos in the page, something that CAN actually show something relevant.... are actually from "apollo mission" and .... can be staged. (Yes, nasa had a moon simulator, used to train the astronauts for landing) and yes, thay had plenty of high res pictures of the moon.
So, again, relax, the "glitches" in the narrative are there and are well documented. If they are glitches in reality or a hoax .... we will see.
Have a nice day
Well the point is that there are now millions of non Americans involved in documenting what you believe is a 1960's American conspiracy. yet no one involved with Space research or industry in the intervening 60 years has taken the opportunity to support your position?
At what point would you consider your stance unreasonable? What's the standard of proof here? Because you seem to be engaging in a game of shifting goalposts
(post is archived)