Probably because a court martial is only for military personnel, not civilians.
Treason, sure (as this definitely could give aid to any current or future enemy), but civilians cannot be subject to a court martial. It would have to go through a normal court.
Probably because a court martial is only for military personnel, not civilians.
Treason, sure (as this definitely could give aid to any current or future enemy), but civilians cannot be subject to a court martial. It would have to go through a normal court.
You're probably right, although civillians have historically been court martialed numerous times, in several (western) countries.
It likely requires extraordinary circumstances, such as "times of war" (or aftermath), a "illegal combattant"-predicate or simply ignoring conventions..
It sounds very lenient and inconsequencial.. maybe she's friend of the Clintons or a $$$ecret jew?
You're probably right, although civillians have historically been court martialed numerous times, in several (western) countries.
It likely requires extraordinary circumstances, such as "times of war" (or aftermath), a "illegal combattant"-predicate or simply ignoring conventions..
It sounds very lenient and inconsequencial.. maybe she's friend of the Clintons or a $$$ecret jew?
(post is archived)