WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

181

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 6 pts

The facts are indisputable: Alec Baldwin pointed a firearm that he knew was real at a co-worker, and he pulled the trigger, and that co-worker died as a result. I would say that there is a great case for Involuntary Manslaughter [NM Stat § 30-2-3 (B)].

[–] 6 pts

But you failed to recognize the liberal authority of Baldwin, which gives him diplomatic immunity.

[–] 2 pts

Yeah, liberals are allowed to get away with anything, apparently...

Remember goy, vigilante justice is bad, let the courts handle it ....

[–] 4 pts

Counter-point: he was explicitly told by two people that it wasn't live. Sure he should take a hit, but the bulk of the blame needs to be leveled at the diversity hire armorer who only got the job because her father was a legend. After her performance on her first gig she should have been run out of town.

Counter-point: he was explicitly told by two people that it wasn't live.

Counter-counter-point: It was a real firearm, so it doesn't matter what "he was told," you don't point those at human beings without a very good reason. Also, you don't accept at face value the term "It's unloaded," you check it yourself. You're still responsible for any negligent discharges.

[–] 0 pt

oh hell naw anyone handed a gun has the responsibility for the safety of said weapon shooting 101

[–] 5 pts

If he doesn't go to jail then they signal all you have to do to kill someone is pretend you are filming a movie, have someone else hand you the gun and say "it's not loaded", then fire away.

[–] 1 pt

In that case, whoever hands over the loaded weapon is criminally liable.

I don’t know why that’s not the case here. While pointing the gun and pulling the trigger during an off camera discussion was a stupid thing for Baldwin to do, it used to be a safe assumption that a gun on a movie set was not loaded with live ammunition unless you were explicitly told so. The people responsible for firearms safety are liable here.

[–] 1 pt

The "right" thing to do if no specific person can be pinned at fault, then the whole group involved with "safety" and the shooter need to go to jail. It's either blamable on an individual, or the collective.

[–] 1 pt

Could turn that into a service to get rid of niggers and kikes. For minimum wage have someone follow you around and film on their phone and do the "it's not loaded" with a handgun. A perfect final solution.

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Murder 1, with a deadly weapon modifier. E;

“One of the possible defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin.”

He won't have anything.

[–] 4 pts

Lets hope they stream the trial

[–] 3 pts

how long would you or I be allowed to live a normal life if we'd done this ?

[–] 1 pt

True good point, lock him up.

[–] 2 pts

I don't see how he is guilty of anything, it was the Armorer chick's responsibility and why would there be live ammo on a movie set anyway? Were they popping off targets for fun out back between takes?

[–] 1 pt

I can see valid reasons for having real ammunition on set. They probably film scenes were trained marksmen actually shoot targets that the characters are supposedly shooting. I read a report on Brandon Lee’s death that said the revolver he was shot with needed real bullets in it for a close up where you could clearly see the bullets. The idiot in charge should have immediately replace them after that was filmed.

[–] 1 pt

not checking whether a gun is loaded every time before you shoot is negligence

passing off responsibility to a prop master is jewy.

[–] 2 pts

As long as when he loses he has to reimburse the state for all the money they're spending to prosecute him.

[–] 1 pt

Let's remember Alec cocked the hammer back then pulled the trigger. This particular gun is not a point and shoot like some handguns. He did this on purpose. He's an evil POS with a big mouth and a whore for a wife.

[–] 1 pt

No he won't.

If he sees the inside of a courtroom, it will be a theater to elevate his stock through constant press. I'm guessing his Hebrew agents probably requested a trial just to give him more press.

Like they're going to convict a Pedowood insider like Alec Baldwin.

[–] 1 pt

A plea deal was struck where he avoids jail time, and gives some money to a good organization like Burisma or the ADL.

[–] 1 pt

He'll probably donate to NAMBLA and BLM kek

[–] 1 pt

Go Read an article of the latest. The family have dropped all claim against him after agreeing to an undisclosed settlement with him, the Prosecution is 'considering' if they will lay any criminal charges at all against him in relation to her death on the understanding that a settlement has been reached with the family. The movie will continue to be finished with approval of her husband and family. Baldwin is still continuing to lay blame on the '2 other people ' who failed. Ie the stupid larping armorer Reed and the dumb as fck assistant dir Hall.

Load more (2 replies)