Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

837

Covid scaremongering is dying down because the u.s. state department, pentagon, and whitehouse are preparing to go war "against" china in Taiwan. They have to make the public believe covid is "no longer deadly" or "manageable". They will go with the variant story. It will go something like "surprisingly new variant is spreading. It seems to be far more mild than even the flu, and shockingly, seems to vaccinate the public against new, deadlier strains."

This is because they intend to issue a draft any time between now and the next four months. And much of the public will use "fear of covid" and resistance to mandatory jabs, as reason to resist the draft.

So they have to wind down covid now if they intend to have a draft and a war with china.

Covid scaremongering is dying down because the u.s. state department, pentagon, and whitehouse are preparing to go war "against" china in Taiwan. They have to make the public believe covid is "no longer deadly" or "manageable". They will go with the variant story. It will go something like "surprisingly new variant is spreading. It seems to be *far* more mild than even the flu, and shockingly, seems to vaccinate the public against new, deadlier strains." This is because they intend to issue a draft any time between now and the next four months. And much of the public will use "fear of covid" and resistance to mandatory jabs, as reason to resist the draft. So they have to wind down covid *now* if they intend to have a draft and a war with china.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

They will go with the variant story.

No, they will run with the "Biden's vaccines stopped the pandemic" story, and every single Democrat will believe and parrot it.

[–] • 0 pt

No, they will run with the "Biden's vaccines stopped the pandemic"

If you go with the theory that the u.s. government and CCP are deeply in bed together, and both face populist revolt from bad economics and uncontrollable public opinions, then it makes sense they might go to limited war in taiwan with the goal of pacifying/distracting each-others citizens.

How they unwind the jab/covid narrative is secondary. But yes, I could see them doing it your way

[–] • 0 pt

A war would be unlimited because the CCP cannot afford to lose face. And the US cannot stop after the first carrier group was taken down by a swarm of hypersonic missiles. A war by proxy would be more likely, but China has no proxies except NK, and NK is not suicidal.

Most likely they really work together: The Pentagon is part of the NATO, and NATO and China are part of the UN. The wars of the future are not country against country, but UN/NATO/CCP against citizens that don't accept the global government. When Chinese troops enter the US, then with blue helmets and invited by a blue state.

[–] • 0 pt

A war would be unlimited because the CCP cannot afford to lose face.

This I wholeheartedly believe. Once the chinese are in, they would be in it to win. Stepping down would lead to the PLA overthrowing the regime.

On the other hand

And the US cannot stop after the first carrier group was taken down by a swarm of hypersonic missiles.

Not if the US doesnt want to.

Why couldn't the u.s. stop though?

And "not stopping" is not equivalent to (nor does it imply) escalating to ever more dangerous weapons.

Why do you think the u.s. is talking about going to "no first strike policy."

The u.s. occupation government wants a war not a nuclear apocalypse.

The u.s. government could care less if the chinese did engage in first-strike with weapons of mass destruction.

In fact, all the more reason for the government to "take the high ground", seize even more power, and radically transition the u.s. into permanent lockdown sovietization "because things are different now unlike the before-before time!"

[–] • 1 pt

1: China would dump all US Treasury products they own, which would crater US finances as they exist today.

2: The US still relies on 1950's doctrine of force-projection via aircraft carriers, and China has demonstrated they possess anti-ship missles that are a major threat to carriers. Go ahead and toss a carrier anywhere near the Straits of Taiwan and see what happens.

3: Afghanistan showed how incompetent the current command structure is.

If we did go to bat for Taiwan, it would be the last major engagement of the USA's as a country, as the optics from sunken carriers would wipe away any remaining belief that we should be taken seriously as a power.

[–] • 1 pt

If we did go to bat for Taiwan, it would be the last major engagement of the USA's as a country

What do we know about the international banking system?

It's changing favorites from the u.s. to china.

China will only play ball if its currency gets preference, either directly, or through a basket of currencies approach.

That can't happen until the USD is dead. The USD is backed up by the u.s. military.

A failed u.s. war in taiwan would do just that.

What nation do you think, under those conditions, the international banks would favor?

Either way, its war.

[–] • 0 pt

It all depends if Taiwan government is stupid enough to push for it

China has stated in loud words that they will not allow taiwan to "detach"

when will it happen ? anytime

[–] • 0 pt

China has stated in loud words that they will not allow taiwan to "detach"

They just launched an ICBM.

An ICBM.

Ask yourself if you still think they're not serious.

[–] • 0 pt

It is not a news that China has ICBM

There is no need to that for Taiwan, it is pretty much close

[–] • 0 pt

There is no need to that for Taiwan, it is pretty much close

Tell Hu to get speakers that write better english.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Covid scaremongering is dying down because the u.s. state department, pentagon, and whitehouse are preparing to go war "against" china in Taiwan.

Maybe we go to war with China but right now they have their man in the White House so there is no need. War with China would be a good thing for the USA which is another reason I don't see it happening soon.

They have to make the public believe covid is "no longer deadly" or "manageable".

I also don't see that happening. What I see is more places going to "covid passports" and more freedoms being removed from the people. I guess we will have to wait and see what actually happens, though. ;)

[–] • 0 pt

If China takes Taiwan quickly and the US admits defeat, China gets the economic output of Taiwan. The coof narrative will continue as the media is already blaming China. Biden falling on his sword is an act. Old white men out, brown woman in. The American empire is over. Time to manage the decline as Barry Obongo would say, with new, wiser brown female leadership.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

If China takes Taiwan quickly and the US admits defeat, China gets the economic output of Taiwan.

It is the heart of the worldwide electronics industry so what's at stake is far more than just mere economic output.

[–] • 0 pt

Absolutely they need the advanced tools and processes that they couldn't engineer or reverse engineer domestically.

[–] • 0 pt

Maybe we go to war with China but right now they have their man in the White House so there is no need.

No, I think theres sufficient popular dissatisfaction in both nations to risk real backlashes.

War with China would be a good thing for the USA which is another reason I don't see it happening soon.

It would also be good for china. Chinese have their just cause "u.s. userping taiwan, blaming us for covid", and the u.s. has a cause for war too, china encroaching on taiwan, and china supposedly causing covid to collapse the economies of other nations like the u.s.

What I see is more places going to "covid passports" and more freedoms being removed from the people.

I see that too. I don't see it as mutually exclusive though. Theres no reason less freedoms/covid passports/more tyranny is the alternative to a war. In fact, if anything, further tyranny and lockdowns woul be cause for the u.s. to go to war, because there would be all the more need for a distraction and excuse for power grabs.

And we both agree theres going to be more power grabs (even if we happen to see a brief -1-3 month walk-back of all these overreaches). It will get worse. We both agree on that.

So the real question is, why wouldn't they go to war when it serves the interests of both nations occupation governments? And when both populations could very easily be at war with their governments if things get worse?

[–] • 0 pt

Xiden fighting Poo Bear?

[–] • 0 pt

Biden will either have serious health issues at the last minute (probably the coof) or he will fuck it up (quick US defeat) and resign, his handlers and media blaming stress worsening his mental decline. Maybe both.

[–] • 0 pt

Xiden fighting Poo Bear?

I don't think it counts as a real fight when an opponent is willing to throw the fight.