Except an actual aerospace engineer confirmed it can fly
Besides, it certainly is amphibious
He didn't say it can fly. He said it was a viable aerodynamic structure. That means there is little left to right wobble--the structure is left/right symmetrical and it generates some lift. A lot of objects have these properties.
"a viable aerodynamic structure" means the structure can fly
Thx for proving my point btw
He said the design experiences some lift, that doesn't mean it would fly.
He said the design experiences some lift, that doesn't mean it would fly.
That's a distinction retarded people are unable to make. A piece of plywood can generate lift too if slightly tilted into the wind.
This is not a science post, it is a pseudoscience post.
>This is not a science post
Oh yes it is you science denier!
And the inverse is also true, if you lift the rear of a flat piece of wood the in-filling vortex will suck it to the ground. A newspaper will snap a thin wooden ruler in half, just because the pressure difference.
The lute is the most aerodynamically superior musical instrument. No piece of wood works better.
https://luth.org/wp-content/uploads/lute_647.jpg
This shit right here.
Now don't get me wrong, a custom 12 string can be just as good, but not a violin, it's just not that good, any way you slice it.
He said it's a viable aerodynamic structure, which means it can fly
Thx for proving my point
Modern cars are aero dynamic, doesn't mean they fly.
aerodynamic means relatively low wind resistance.
If you strapped wings on that thing and a fit an RC plane kit it might fly.
>Except an actual aerospace engineer confirmed..
Haven't seen the video and am not going to, but 'actual medical engineers confirmed' that you need to take the vax..
>Haven't seen the video and am not going to
That's called denial of reality
>but 'actual medical engineers confirmed' that you need to take the vax..
Projecting much?
Retard
>>Haven't seen the video and am not going to That's called denial of reality
Nope, just not interested
>Projecting much? Retard
Definitely projecting on similarities and definitely not a retard..
Would you back the claim '1000 actual engineers can't be wrong'?
(post is archived)