Looks like a boat. The fact that a boat-shape can generate some lift doesn't mean it's fit to fly.
It's a viable aerodynamic structure, no more, no less. A plane's fuselage won't fly without the wings but that fuselage is a viable aerodynamic structure, or it wouldn't be on the plane.
Why do they make the shapes tear drop shaped? What happens if you flip the teardrop upside down, bulbous end at the rear, sharp at the front? You'd get a pair of recirculating vortices wouldn't you?
Except an actual aerospace engineer confirmed it can fly
Besides, it certainly is amphibious
He didn't say it can fly. He said it was a viable aerodynamic structure. That means there is little left to right wobble--the structure is left/right symmetrical and it generates some lift. A lot of objects have these properties.
"a viable aerodynamic structure" means the structure can fly
Thx for proving my point btw
He said the design experiences some lift, that doesn't mean it would fly.
He said the design experiences some lift, that doesn't mean it would fly.
That's a distinction retarded people are unable to make. A piece of plywood can generate lift too if slightly tilted into the wind.
This is not a science post, it is a pseudoscience post.
He said it's a viable aerodynamic structure, which means it can fly
Thx for proving my point
>Except an actual aerospace engineer confirmed..
Haven't seen the video and am not going to, but 'actual medical engineers confirmed' that you need to take the vax..
>Haven't seen the video and am not going to
That's called denial of reality
>but 'actual medical engineers confirmed' that you need to take the vax..
Projecting much?
Retard
(post is archived)