Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

826

>Now, it would be nice if there were a lesson in this list of errors that might help scientists do better in the future. But the whole history of science shows that such errors are actually unavoidable. There is a lesson, though, based on what the mistakes on this list have in common: They’re all on a list of errors now known to be errors. Science, unlike certain political philosophies and personality cults, corrects its mistakes. That’s the lesson, and that’s why respecting science is so important to avoiding errors in other realms of life.

Yes "respect science" experts say... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimz-PZMjjs

>>Now, it would be nice if there were a lesson in this list of errors that might help scientists do better in the future. But the whole history of science shows that such errors are actually unavoidable. There is a lesson, though, based on what the mistakes on this list have in common: They’re all on a list of errors now known to be errors. Science, unlike certain political philosophies and personality cults, corrects its mistakes. That’s the lesson, and **that’s why respecting science** is so important to avoiding errors in other realms of life. Yes "respect science" experts say... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rimz-PZMjjs

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

A "clever soup" popping out of nowhere, just like that? A "clever soup" relying on a very complex "mechanism" called DNA to generate all sorts of biomechanical entities, some being self aware

I find that very unlikely

Just as unlikely as a computer popping out of nowhere with an AI installed on it

I don't think the existence of that computer and its AI are just the result of randomness

[–] • 0 pt

well it was never going to be easy? here's what we have so far: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_biology

lots of little steps within the process have already been replicated

and RNA predates DNA and it's much simpler https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26876/

and a few neurons are capable of astonishing levels of thinking

I don't think any other contradicting explanation is required at this point, unless people just like the idea of a deity they can talk to and a religion that separates them from monkeys. Even a God would just create soup and stare at it for a long time ("look, I made life...")

[–] • 0 pt

So you have scientific facilities, very complex structures that are anything but the result of mere randomness, required for people trying to copy and replicate mechanisms that are found in what we call nature

And this is supposed to prove that the so called "clever soup" is just the result of randomness?

...

I think those scientists are studying somebody else's project here

[–] • 0 pt

Which evidence better fits the model?

God creates a universe, eventually choses the best looking rock globe and then sits there for a billion years trying out different flavours of soup, fish, dinosaurs and squirrels before finally settling on making a man (and for some reason making niggers amazingly similar to monkeys)

Or soup evolved and we have a long trail of weird stuff that it all involved into until we ended up with clever monkeys which then forked into men and niggers.

men look at these processes and can replicate most of them, a bit like I can do any of the jobs required to build a house, but I haven't actually built a whole one yet.

If any one person was clever enough to understand all these processes simultaneously, then we wouldn't need quite so many people studying it all