![Libtards are really bad at logic. [750x1072 - 120KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/x6Szhv.jpg){kind=link}
Brainwashed much?
Trees don't grow on volcanic rock.
Who's 'we'? Alledged scientists? Where's their proof? Were those who sailed away to nz and Chile easily recognizable from their GIANT STONE HEADS?!?!
You need to explain this one to the biden administration.
Again, trees don't grow on VOLCANIC ROCK. And if what you say is true, then how are building a shit ton of WINDMILLS and SOLAR PANELS, instead of PLANTING TREES going to solve "globull warming" now? You need explain THIS ONE to the "green" ecoterrorists.
Of course soil erosion would be a problem, it's a fucking island, it's perimeter is nothing but evidence of soil erosion, most people call that a fucking beach, and if the "soil erosion" were as bad as you claim Easter Island would have ERODED AWAY centuries ago, but again, it takes alot longer to erode the VOLCANIC ROCK WHICH NOTHING GROWS ON.
If I were you, I wouldn't put to much faith in the "scientists" that you got this BS from, keep in mind their track record of being right about anything is about 50/50...50% lies, fabrications, and exaggeration - 50% complete bullshit.
A good rule of thumb is never believe somebody who's getting paid to do research - if you pay them enough, they'll say just about anything. Because if they don't, you threaten to cut them off.
If it were volcanic rock rapanui and would of had been able to grow their sweet potato crops and end up with a massive population.
1 line in and you began with a false premise.
Try again with a premise that acknowledges the large population
Where's the proof of a "large population"?
The huge Labour required to make the moai.
So every researcher puts the population at least at 10 people per square kilometer which is really high for a stone age people.
Feed by fertile soil.
They chopped down every tree including food trees like nut trees.
Explain how you think this wouldn't hurt ecology?
(post is archived)