WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome.

Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii.

Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

This fellow breaks down what would be needed for an effective orbital DEW as well as the challenges that would need to be overcome. Spoiler: Laser based weapons are doable but, he doesn't think this was done in Hawaii. Personally, I'm not sure DEW was used in Hawaii but, I do know that the government is hiding something and likely have weapons tech beyond the parameters discussed here. The limitations however are due to the nature of the universe so even if the gov has better this video should still apply. The question becomes how did they overcome the limitations and to what degree.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Well, you shouldn't. As you can see, my commentary is fully supported by the video and well documented/published research. My comment to , given that it's techno-jargon-jabber, which exists completely outside of the context of any of my comments, fully implies he used ChatGPT to generate his comment. Thus the angling of his stupidity in reply. And he likely didn't understand what he posted, as otherwise he would know he didn't correct anything I stated; even ignoring the techno-jabber-babble. Otherwise he would know his comment is nonsense in regard to his dishonestly aggressive comment to me for the context. Opps. He overplayed his hand and exposed himself.

Additionally, either we (me and the guy in the video) are both correct or we're both wrong. According to Morbo, we're both wrong because he generated some techno-jabber-bullshit with ChatGPT, completely out of context for anything I actually stated. Worse, as you can confirm for yourself (discussion followed here), I already confirmed the guy in the video is at least partially wrong. Discussion and links provided. Opps. There goes more of Morbo's bullshit commentary.

Be careful who you trust online as there are many immoral, subversive people who wish nothing more than to manipulate you.

[–] 1 pt

My comment to , given that it's techno-jargon-jabber, which exists completely outside of the context of any of my comments, fully implies he used ChatGPT to generate his comment.

Go ahead and prove I used an AI to write my comments. You appear to be an expert in AI as well as lasers so please show us all your proof that I used ChatGPT.

It's pretty clear you are here on Poal to push your disinformation. We have been through this same sort of argument too many times for it to be anything but a (((cohencidence))).

I'll wait for your proof of ChatGPT use but I know you will not bring it since you never bring proof when challenged.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Notice how you dodge every fact offered. I did. Move that goalpost.

You are extremely dishonest, subversive, and manipulative. And you came out of nowhere to do so. What ax do you have to grind against me that you've made up this entire fiction and exposed yourself? Butthurt over past exchanges? Guess you really don't like me now because you keep getting called out and exposed. I'll let others try to determine your agenda.

[–] -1 pt

Notice how you dodge every fact offered. I did. Move that goalpost.

Notice how dodges every request for proof of his claims that I am not genuine in my information. He always tries to (((turn it around))) on me instead of bringing proof.

It's amazing how you try so hard to silence people who don't agree with your made up bullshit. I don't come out of nowhere on the subject of lasers. My posting history shows I am consistent in commenting on this topic because I am knowledgeable in this subject matter. You, on the other hand, have never once demonstrated any of what you supply to be real and instead just use words that you obviously don't understand. You are either highly affected by the Dunning-Kruger Effect or you just like to spread disinfo on random topics because you desperately seek attention and validation. Or you're just here to subvert facts and truth.

Why do you act so whiny and clueless instead of engaging in actual discussion if you know so much about this subject? Why not actually discuss things with me and prove I'm "cheating" or making shit up? Let's do this properly so you can have your chance to "expose" me.

[–] 1 pt

Sorry buddy, your intentions are good but, you are indeed out of your depth here. Most of what he was talking about is the actual "structure" of a given laser beam and how that affects the target material.

He wasn't trying to prove you wrong. He was showing where your analogies were inconsistent with the subject and why.

I don't trust Morbo, I don't trust you, I don't trust myself to be right every time.

Wisdom isn't knowing something, it's knowing how to know something you didn't know before. . You're welcome.

Chill with the whiney kvetching you are starting to sound nasally.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Nope. Wrong again. I'm fully aware of what he spoke to via his ChatGPT bullshit. He completely ignores the facts as stated. The very purpose of my statement directly speaks to the convergence of a "beam" and the associated technology used to control it. It's literally the reason why these technologies exist. Him describing the cross sectional power distribution and so on is 100% completely irrelevant to anything stated. That's the problem. He then spewed tangential, irrelevant, bullshit with techno-babble. The fact he didn't even understand this is why it's very strong evidence he simply copy-pasted from ChatGPT. Him then coming in and describing physics of why the technology exists is stupidity to fool the foolish. He knows it. This is why be back peddled. He knows he was exposed and overplayed his hand.

Additionally, as is discussed in other threads, atmospheric distortion detection and correction is a decades old technology. Which means my statement remains correct, contrary to OP's and his.

What you don't understand is that I didn't engage on the physics discussion BECAUSE it's completely irrelevant to the very point I made. The fact he doesn't understand this is proof he's out of his depth. Which the guy in the video goes on to explain why I'm correct - albeit still somewhat incorrect on atmospheric issues. You see, once the atmosphere becomes energized, it actually pushes it out of the way, frequently creating plasma around it (these are very high energy levels), and allows for a precise signal to be placed on the beam (or another), using it as a carrier wave. The returned signals allow signal distortion analysis, for further beam confinement, beam steering, and so on. Accordingly, since the very purpose of a DEW is NOT a parallel beam (which idiot didn't understand and actively attempts to distort/hide/jabber around - thus the complete irrelevance of cross sectional distribution - in context). DEWs purposely use a convergent beam. Moron here even acknowledges this with mention of specific antenna technologies - which I had already topically addressed.

There's an old phrase. “If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” Congratulations, he just baffled you with bullshit. And successfully tricked you.

[–] 0 pt

Does it irritate you that we live on a wet oblate spheroid rock with a pressurized atmosphere next to a vacuum?

I bet it does.

At any rate you'll be alright, just hang it there buddy. I'm sure you will be justified when we finally drill deep enough to hit turtle shell.