Wait, I'm mildly confused. I have no skin in this. But believing that the Epstein list is a psy op is akeen to pedophila? Please explain cause I feel like I'm missing details in this situation
Why do you think Trump told his supporters to forget about Epstein?
Lurker just followed orders to gatekeep and downplay the horrible child trafficking that happened under Epstein, calling it a psyop.
I think it was both. It's pretty clear Virginia Guffree's testimony was real and that Epstein and a whole shit load of people around him were pedos. It's also beyond a reasonable doubt that it was a blackmail ring, or some kind of sick initiation ritual.
But I also think it's being leveraged as a psyop. The Miami Herald broke the story nationally. That paper was bought by a bunch of jews two years earlier. It's now being used as a massive distraction from the replacement of White people globally. Nothing will ever come out to implicate powerful jews, and blue-jew team is now using it as a tool of distraction. So, it can be both.
Lurker, being a massive 2-more-weeks Qtard, probably thought of it as a binary. It's not.
I mean, I guess I can see how A connects to B. But I guess I see these Epstein deniers as more of a QAnon situation. VERY misguided but not intentionally malicious. If you warned him of the potential TOS violation in sharing that viewpoint I can understand. I just don't see it as an overt endorsement of pedophilia so much as a misguided person who is "following the plan" so to speak.
You do you though, you probably have more behind the scenes info that I'm not privy to.
We have had several exchanges in PM where he was condescending (calling me "son" lol) and acting superior, like the typical faggit power user. He was mad because some sleeper Q accounts got caught exclusively upvoting him (vote gaming), which resulted for him in a loss of a few thousands points (when their fake votes got cancelled). He got really pissed, claiming he lost 2 years of points, and he's here to compete with other high score accounts.
Adding that he openly supported the replacement of Whites in America, as long as it was done "legally".
Lurker claimed to be a victim of harassment and his free speech was impeded when anyone called him out. He might as well openly have dared AOU to ban him. In fact, I called for his ban 17 days ago when he said the Epstein Client list was "an insignificant issue" because Trump told him to forget about it.
Yes, the largest pedophile ring and blackmail operation in THE ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD was "An insignificant issue" according to Lurker17.
For more context, Lurker has been consistently downplaying Trump's actions and trying to frame them all as Good and that Trump is literally infallible because... well, reasons.
This includes, in very recent times, eagerly following Trump to say that Epstein's trafficking operations were fake or over blown, that the list doesn't exist, and that it's actually a GOOD thing that Trump is openly defending pedophiles because... it's Trump and there's a 23823828389493090234 step plan to totally own the (((DEEP STATE))) that totally demands he pardon high level pedophiles and ignore the big pedophile rings. Including the fact that Trump is obviously on the list of pedophiles, but Lurker always claimed that "Well, if Trump was on it, the Democrats would release it to hurt him!" when that's obvious bullshit. Lurker's Trump Deification Syndrome grew more and more erratic over time, leading him to openly dismiss pedophiles in power while saying that it's a good thing no one is being arrested because "it's a show" and the "Real fun" is starting... soon, always soon.
Lurker is also in favor of Mass Non-White immigration (invasion) and the replacement of Whites, going so far as to downplay White Genocide and claim that it straight up isn't happening. He was subversive at best, and he finally tipped his hand in the last week and a half.
I'm not arguing any of that. I've noticed his die hard protection of Trump and crew despite past evidence. My hesitation is I saw him more in the light of a QAnon follower than an outright subverter of the conversation. I know a lot of people who are still "on the Trump train" so to speak, and will defend everything he does like it's a personal attack on them.
But what do I know about anything? I'm just a toilet cleaning frog. Thinking isn't my forte.
Nah, it's fine. I elaborated more on my other reply to you. Honestly, AOU had a lot of patience with Lurker, this was just the final straw.