Then read what OP said. You defend the position that young girls wearing shorts like underwear isn't sexualization of young girls while claiming you support more modesty than most.
Your own statements are in conflict.
You defend the position that young girls wearing shorts like underwear isn't sexualization of young girls while claiming you support more modesty than most.
No, I made an argument over what is considered a child. I never said that dressing like that is acceptable.
I see. I would argue that a 15 year old is a child.
If she can bare a child then she isn't a child.
(post is archived)