![Greatest cope of all time goes to dilbert cuck. We weren't just guessing. The russia hoax ended when the impeachment hoax began which ended when covid began (all 3 seriously within 36 hours direct relay to the next). Doesn't take a genius to know the third one is a hoax and to not take the vaxx. [720x1201 - 123KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/KY3Hn8.jpg){kind=link}
Plus it's not even a vaccine, it's a DNA altering (despite that they claim it only affects RNA, it actually causes reverse transcription into DNA) gene therapy.
it actually causes reverse transcription into DNA
I've seen studies that found reverse transcription of genes from the virus, but none that attributed the cause to vaccines. I'm sure it happens, I just think it's extremely rare, though it's hard to be certain how rare reverse transcription is or how harmful it is when it happens.
Most of the people who would conduct studies are complicit in the poison gene therapy, so inevitably there will be few or no studies showing evidence of reverse transcription by the vaccine. But by the nature of how the mRNA gene therapy works it's likely to cause reverse transcription, probably in most cases, which means that people who take the poison are potentially going to have their cells generating toxic spike proteins for life if that happens to them. Maybe it doesn't happen in all cases, but if they're taking 5, 10, 20 boosters, eventually it will and then they're even more fucked.
But by the nature of how the mRNA gene therapy works it's likely to cause reverse transcription
My understanding is that the reverse transcription happens when the cell uses a DNA repair mechanism to reverse transcribe mRNA back into the DNA. Given that the mRNA is nowhere near the nucleus and the reverse transcription happens only under very specific conditions, it is said that the process is highly unlikely. What makes you say the opposite? What is it about the vax that makes this more likely?
(post is archived)