https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/jw-sues-pa-voting/
>Judicial Watch Sues to Force Pennsylvania to Clean Its Voter Rolls, Alleges Pennsylvania Has over 800,000 Inactive Voters on Rolls
Nothing to see here, right?
>In its complaint, Judicial Watch points out that the State’s abnormally low number of removals under NVRA procedures designed to identify voters who have changed residence indicates that it is not removing inactive registrations as the law requires.
Why is that? They probably forgot to do their job, hm
Either you're very naive or partisan, I go for the latter... And that's funny because you voted for "you ain't black" joe biden
Dems really fucked everybody on this one, starting with bernie bros, who obviously went with that
Judicial Watch is not only an unreliable source, it's literally not even a news source. They spread fake news and file bogus lawsuits.
Try again.
What's a reliable source now? Snope? "Fact check"? Huffpo?
LOL not partisan at all! Totally neutral!
Bias and reliability are different. Snopes is left but reliable. Huffpo is left-center and unreliable. "Fact check" is a verb for a thing editors and researchers do for reporters.... did you mean factcheck.org? or politifact? both are neutral and reliable.
But no, I told you you could find a right-wing reliable source. Wall Street Journal, Fox News, National Review, The Economist
Hint: if you can't find what you're looking for.......................................................... it's because it doesn't exist
(post is archived)