WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

497

has it hit you yet? that Trump can't bully his way out of this loss?

has it hit you yet? that Trump can't bully his way out of this loss?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Judicial Watch is not only an unreliable source, it's literally not even a news source. They spread fake news and file bogus lawsuits.

Try again.

[–] 0 pt

What's a reliable source now? Snope? "Fact check"? Huffpo?

LOL not partisan at all! Totally neutral!

[–] 0 pt

Bias and reliability are different. Snopes is left but reliable. Huffpo is left-center and unreliable. "Fact check" is a verb for a thing editors and researchers do for reporters.... did you mean factcheck.org? or politifact? both are neutral and reliable.

But no, I told you you could find a right-wing reliable source. Wall Street Journal, Fox News, National Review, The Economist

Hint: if you can't find what you're looking for.......................................................... it's because it doesn't exist

[–] 0 pt

>Snopes is left but reliable

LOL

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/29/the-unreliable-facts-of-a-fact-checking-site/

The “fact check” site is useful when vetting a news story that favors a progressive take. If even the left-leaning Snopes finds it false or mostly false, that’s pretty persuasive. But not so much when it comes to something involving conservatives or conservative causes.

This past week, Snopes jumped the shark. In a post about California Assembly Bill 2943, a frightening piece of pure-grade totalitarianism, Snopes belittled a conservative opponent and misrepresented the legislation.

So much for reliability!