![White Identity is not White Supremacy [411x385 - 26KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/a71oCT.png){kind=link}
My mission is not to compare and determine which is better - my mission is to secure a fruitful future for my White son.
If you get caught up in other stuff, I believe you are doing their work and hurting the movement.
The majority of whites avoiding the obvious hurts our movement.
What is our movement you refer to? I'd like to better understand so I can help represent White identity better.
Here is my take on that:
You can feel good about yourself, or you can protect your people. If you believe White's are superior, you should be smart enough to know what battle is worth fighting. Keep fighting that battle and keep hurting the future for White's? Or transcend it to help protect White identity from erosion and marginalization.
Do you think it's in your son's best interest to live in a country where non-whites are allowed an equal or greater say in his future?
That is a great question.
It is in my son's best interest to be able to have a say at all. The way things are going - this is quickly being stripped of him.
In regard to non-Whites and their say; I believe everyone should have an equal say. On that note, I believe it is in my son's best interest to live in a majority White nation. The way things are going - this is quickly being stripped of him.
Ensuring Whites are able to communicate their perspective, insecurities, successes and everything in between is important for me. I believe the first step is to gain ground on that front.
Please let me know what you think and how I can improve my thought process. I appreciate your engagement!
You're on the right track, and you should probably keep your current position publicly, however if you think these things out to the logical conclusion you'll probably arrive where the rest of us are.
The left is right about of few things, one of them being the paradox of tolerance. If we allow intolerant ideologies such as liberalism, judaism, communism, islam, to have equal footing in our society they will dominate and destroy us. Same with races who are supremacist. What race is supremacist? Black, hispanics, asians, arabs...all of them.
If they are allowed in our societies at all it must be as second class citizens, explicitly and with no path to equality. Otherwise the paradox of tolerance attaches and our own tolerance destroys us. You are seeing this happen today.
Who is content being a second class citizen aside from a diplomat or import/export business? You're one now and you see that it endangers you and your child. You're working to gain dominance, this is natural and normal, so it should be expected of all groups. Why would a society open itself up to that kind of conflict? Racial or religious diversity is, unequivocally, not a strength.
Furthermore, if you look to the future most non-whites have reached their civilizational peak. Blacks can not progress past mud huts and spears. When separeted from whites they regress. Hispanics can not progress past the wild west. Without whites they are stuck there. IQ is a ceiling and most of the world has reached it's cap. As we are dragged down by diversity quotas we are stuck where we are. If you want a spacefaring future then the entitlement and uncontrolled breeding of populations with sub 100 IQs needs to stop. Only asians are arguably on our level. So why not fully support white supremacy? Is it not objectively the path to the best imaginable future? Why abuse children by forcing them to live as 80 IQ brown people who can't function in modern society? Is that not just objectively evil?
Is there a place where whites are afforded the most opportunities besides the Third Reich?
Any white country without jews and before they were flooded with non-whites.
(post is archived)