WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It could legitimately be a facelift, but I doubt it.

The "conspiracy" here isnt even conspiracy worthy. The use of doubles, both for scheduling conflicts, and security, is an open secret in D.C.

So much so that if this isnt actually Joe, then even members of the GOP and media likely know.

Run him through facial recognition, see if he matches joe. Well, they might have done that in the process of picking their candidate, so the trick is likely hit or miss.

The bigger scandal, and everyone knows it, is not just that joe wasnt elected at all, but that if this is a security double, then a guy who didnt even run for president, is being allowed to act as president.

While I'd go so far as to say its not joe, the weirdness of the narrative defeats any evidence we might have. That means this is either a slow-news-day item ("man bites dog") or a distraction story.

If true it would also mean they don't want Kamala in office as president.

[–] 0 pt

I didn't know the US used doubles like saddam did, I mean to the point that it was bordering an open secret

At the same time saddam learned all his tricks from alphabetsoup agencies, so it makes sense, sort of

>The bigger scandal, and everyone knows it, is not just that joe wasnt elected at all, but that if this is a security double, then a guy who didnt even run for president, is being allowed to act as president.

Yes, saddam used doubles for security reasons, this would be completely different, it would be to usurp power

>While I'd go so far as to say its not joe, the weirdness of the narrative defeats any evidence we might have.

Absolutely

https://poal.co/s/Odd/569454/de61aeee-ada9-45a2-ba00-ea0d32ceb6ce#cmnts

>Joe biden dies they replace him with a lame ass look-alike, and when people notice the difference they say facial surgery went wrong, perfect cover story. Best part being that the look-alike indeed went through facial surgery... How could you tell?

[–] 1 pt

I was thinking specifically of Saddam when I made the comment. Good on you.

The bias is that acting like it's a big secret or some huge revelation, causes people to perceive it as much less likely.

If I were even running for so much as congress, I would find someone to be my double.

And if Saddam did it then we already have precedent.

Assume there is nothing special about the regime's security state.