Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

507

I've never heard of any authorities using any emergency broadcast system for actual emergencies. Maui's system being the latest example not to be switched on. New York certainly didn't use theirs during their emergency. So what's the point of having it at all? Why bother people with a test if it's never going to be used?

I've never heard of any authorities using any emergency broadcast system for actual emergencies. Maui's system being the latest example not to be switched on. New York certainly didn't use theirs during their emergency. So what's the point of having it at all? Why bother people with a test if it's never going to be used? [Conspiracy](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-fema-test-graphene-oxide-covid-vaccine-517946413392) [Conspiracy](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/21/instagram-posts/femas-emergency-alert-test-wont-activate-graphene/)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (14).
[–] • 1 pt

Or maybe it's the 5G kill signal

How many more years do we have to wait before 5G kills us? 3G and 4G never got around to killing us. Will we have to wait for 7G? 9G? 666G?

Do we really have to play this game of nG is going to kill us every time we switch cellular technology? If 5G doesn't start killing us soon, then everyone needs to STFU about it.

[–] • 0 pt

Technically it is "killing" us, just not so directly. I know your not that thick to think these frequencies don't affect our bodies negatively... The zombie stuff and "kill shot" (activation) theories are retarded. There is a long provable correlation between wireless technologies and human disease. Not that it causes disease, but more rather it makes us more susceptible to disease.

[–] • 0 pt

There is a long provable correlation between wireless technologies and human disease.

Citation for this? No videos of random people claiming this without any documented proof please.

[–] • 0 pt

Well, I remember there was a video of a school teacher doing an experiment with his class. Two isolated containers. Inside each were seeds ready to start growing, and one of the containers also had something that emitted wifi or something like that up and running. The container without the device grew, while the one that DID have the device did not.

The experiment was about between a week and three weeks long, I think. Been a while since I saw the video.

But it makes you think.

[–] • 0 pt

Not my job. You either look for yourself or don't. I could care less. If you want to know you'll look... It's not my burden to prove anything. Refute it if you will, but the science behind the tech is well known and there is a plethora of data available. Me linking to a paper or two proves nothing. Do your own research and come back when and if you can prove me wrong or right...