WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

276

I've never heard of any authorities using any emergency broadcast system for actual emergencies. Maui's system being the latest example not to be switched on. New York certainly didn't use theirs during their emergency. So what's the point of having it at all? Why bother people with a test if it's never going to be used?

I've never heard of any authorities using any emergency broadcast system for actual emergencies. Maui's system being the latest example not to be switched on. New York certainly didn't use theirs during their emergency. So what's the point of having it at all? Why bother people with a test if it's never going to be used? [Conspiracy](https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-fema-test-graphene-oxide-covid-vaccine-517946413392) [Conspiracy](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/21/instagram-posts/femas-emergency-alert-test-wont-activate-graphene/)

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Technically it is "killing" us, just not so directly. I know your not that thick to think these frequencies don't affect our bodies negatively... The zombie stuff and "kill shot" (activation) theories are retarded. There is a long provable correlation between wireless technologies and human disease. Not that it causes disease, but more rather it makes us more susceptible to disease.

[–] 0 pt

There is a long provable correlation between wireless technologies and human disease.

Citation for this? No videos of random people claiming this without any documented proof please.

[–] 0 pt

Well, I remember there was a video of a school teacher doing an experiment with his class. Two isolated containers. Inside each were seeds ready to start growing, and one of the containers also had something that emitted wifi or something like that up and running. The container without the device grew, while the one that DID have the device did not.

The experiment was about between a week and three weeks long, I think. Been a while since I saw the video.

But it makes you think.

[–] 1 pt

Well, I remember there was a video of a school teacher doing an experiment with his class. Two isolated containers. Inside each were seeds ready to start growing, and one of the containers also had something that emitted wifi or something like that up and running. The container without the device grew, while the one that DID have the device did not.

I am familiar with that video. While there was some attempts to make it a proper scientific experiment, the overall experiment did not control for other variables that could have explained the outcome. The experiment was not multiple times to determine if there truly was a correlation between the process and the results. The whole video seemed to start with the assumption that the plants with the signal would behave differently so there was definitely bias in the experiment.

My background and knowledge as an electrical engineer and physics (I work as a software engineer now though) tells me that the fears of EMF radiation are mostly unwarranted. I have seen plants thrive in lots of places where high power output EMF radiation is constant and I have also had plenty of exposure to it myself with no discernable effects. People seem to think that being exposed to EMF radiation is a new thing, but we have all been bombarded by it throughout our lives so there is no way to get a proper "baseline" for non-exposed individuals. It's everywhere from both man-made and natural sources so there's no escaping it. I'm just not convinced of the threat and fear because I have worked in this realm professionally and very closely. I fear the effects of exposure to small gasoline engines more than I do EMF radiation. I find it odd that no one else seems to think they are a problem but are quick to distrust EMF producing devices.

[–] 0 pt

Not my job. You either look for yourself or don't. I could care less. If you want to know you'll look... It's not my burden to prove anything. Refute it if you will, but the science behind the tech is well known and there is a plethora of data available. Me linking to a paper or two proves nothing. Do your own research and come back when and if you can prove me wrong or right...

[–] 0 pt

Not my job. You either look for yourself or don't. I could care less. If you want to know you'll look... It's not my burden to prove anything.

It's not my job to just accept your claims without any backup material. I've done my research throughout my career in this field. None of the claims line up with real world applications and data.

Do your own research and come back when and if you can prove me wrong or right...

I'll use your words here: Not my job. You either look for yourself or don't. I could care less.