For full self-driving? Yeah, I could see a monthly fee. Developing the software for that is probably a never ending process.
Now, is it worth $200 a month? And for $200 a month, my car better not be getting into accidents, and if it does, Tesla better be willing to pay-out all related costs because of it.
Maybe that's why it'll cost $200 a month? It's almost insurance.
No. The first quote in the article is
With Full Self-Driving (FSD) capability, you will get access to a suite of more advanced driver assistance features, designed to provide more active guidance and assisted driving under your active supervision," explains the company.
The owner is still liable for all accidents or injuries.
The whole self driving thing won't really be popular until either it is so cheap that anyone can have it or owners are not found liable for when the vehicle kills someone.
Or until the government passes some legislation like it did for vaccine manufacturers for the auto company and owner of the cars for some "environmental" reason.
Owner? What's that? Do you mean the control seat occupant and the end user / service contract holder are jointly responsible?
Good point. I guess Owner/Operator would be more accurate.
I hope they hurry up with the self Driving. I hate driving.
Sorry I'm late boss. My car drove slow.
This is where George hotz is 100% correct.
If anybody on planet Earth develops full self-driving software then we can just reverse engineer it for free.
(post is archived)