You do understand it's not "the readers" telling me how to be taken seriously, it's the fool. You say the readers, but you can only speak as a fool. Just assume this post is for others, not you.
Hold the bus! I'm a reader too!
Yes junior, you are a single reader. There are other readers that agree with you, and others that don't.
PS:
Greenpeace is the dancing whore for lobbying corporations who pay the most.
Wow that's retarded. Remember those massive global agricultural, mining, electricity and fossil fuel industries? They're paying the people who brainwash you, not Greenpeace.
Sorry, I actually misspelled it.
It's GreenPiss.
Fixed!
I'm one of "the readers" (kek, who isn't?). Defending Greenpeace sponsored research while attacking Big Industry sponsored research just seems like a silly hill to die on.
Greenpeace gain nothing by producing false research. It's not like they lack environmental disasters to try to make assholes care about.
Big industry gets to pollute, and profit for a few more years by producing misleading research and inaccurate propaganda to delay action on environmental issues.
I can tell you're pretty hot under the collar, so I'll hold off. Just not a very persuasive position you have chosen by advocating Greenpeace's work. Plenty of real environmentalists and conservationists doing good work out there; they hate radicals painting them all in a bad light.
Greenpeace gain nothing by producing false research.
They actually do, that's their business model.
I won't say their "research" are false, but they are totally biased to please their corporate sponsors.
You have as much luck swaying people as I do saying gas the kikes and hang the niggers. Fucking LOL at you.
(post is archived)