But I’m glad you admitted that you actually believe that this is a real space ship, which hilariously disqualifies you from even debating the shape of the earth.
So tell me where did you train in aerospace engineering? Physics? Engineering in general? How would you design it? What parameters are needed to be taken into account?
My qualifications for declaring that “lunar excursion module” an embarrassingly bad fake prop made of cardboard, foil, and curtain rods are as follows:
not legally blind
graduated fourth grade
So you have a degree in personal incredulity. No real evidence other than it doesn't meat what you picture a lunar lander to look like in Your head?
Still waiting for that map, measurement, model, or prediction.
Are you implying there are no FE maps? That wouldn’t prove anything anyway and unlike you I’m not interested in posting irrelevant garbage that doesn’t bolster my claims.
And measurements? What? I’m denying the globe, not the freaking metric system.
Prediction? What the hell? Maybe explain what you’re talking about?
But anyway, I do want to take a brief break from embarrassing you to actually give you some credit: you are the first person who ever has made a dedicated thread about this when I challenged him to. I respect that, rather than expecting me to type this many words in a days-old thread that no one will see.
But, unfortunately for the globetards, the more neutral observers who see this, the more flat earthers there will be in the future. No one ever goes back to believing in the globe once they truly think critically about it.
(post is archived)