It’s not necessary to have a reflector on the moon to detect reflected lasers from it, as it as done as early as 1966 to measure the supposed distance to moon. This is what the link to an old Nat Geo article you didn’t read explained.
I still absolutely don’t believe that you did this “experiment” but even if you did, it was in a supervised setting where the Texas sharpshooter fallacy was used to create the illusion — you certainly didn’t see a reflector to know it was there. Even if it were there, you supposedly believe in lunar rovers and space probes, so it wouldn’t by any means prove that astronauts placed it there.
But I’m glad you admitted that you actually believe that is a real space ship, which hilariously disqualifies you from even debating the shape of the earth.
But I’m glad you admitted that you actually believe that this is a real space ship, which hilariously disqualifies you from even debating the shape of the earth.
So tell me where did you train in aerospace engineering? Physics? Engineering in general? How would you design it? What parameters are needed to be taken into account?
My qualifications for declaring that “lunar excursion module” an embarrassingly bad fake prop made of cardboard, foil, and curtain rods are as follows:
not legally blind
graduated fourth grade
So you have a degree in personal incredulity. No real evidence other than it doesn't meat what you picture a lunar lander to look like in Your head?
Still waiting for that map, measurement, model, or prediction.
Then why if you miss the location of the reflector does the laser not return as strong as hitting the "alleged " locations?
You’re just asserting that. Unless you can show that you’ve done the work, it’s just an assertion and you’re just a gobshite.
Again, even if you showed this happening, it wouldn’t prove that men walked, played golf, and drove stupid dune buggies on the moon during the Vietnam War.
I don't have tondo every experiment ever done for it to be valid.
And you guys always take it to NASA. Nothing in my original post and my observations have ANYTHING to do with NASA. I don't need NASA or any space agency to demonstrate the Earth's shape. I think this is settled. You have no evidence. "You just go look at my vidya from yooootube" and "looks flat bro".
Now then.
Present a map, measurement, model, or prediction based on the flat earth. Or admit you have no evidence.
(post is archived)