Which means even more starving Africans.
Which means more african immigration...
There's no way around it; our entire demographic debasement problem via mass immigration is based on a constitutional/legal void/unthought; there's no legal mention of what the people actually is, it can be any people, african, chinese, arabs, whatever and that's what we have as a result, there's no implicit or explicit mention that the people has to be white
There was in federal law until 1965.
Indeed, but that was only a law (that got repealed) it's not a "constitutional provision", which is what's actually required
Australia had a white Australia law.
Laws don't protect you from infiltration and subversion.
Laws don't protect you from infiltration and subversion.
But they do, generally, erect barriers that make it more difficult than it otherwise would be.
Seeing the failure of the concept of laws in general, I don't know if they're a net negative at this point, simply because it seems in the long run all the idea of 'law' does is give short-term gains, but lull each nation that tries it into complacency.
oh no thats tragic. please dont have them all starve
(post is archived)