Lol, you are so full of shit.
Yes I did. It's is a graduation requirement for Physics 403 w/lab.
Explain how we were able to hit the reflector and all of the data from globe earth and the Apolo missions got us on target. Explain it. Or admit you have zero real evidence. You say "nu-uh" and nothing more. You're ignorant.
You have no evidence because there is no evidence. There is no map, no measurements, no function model. Nothing.
How about this. Nice and easy. Show me a map of the flat earth.
Wait if you can hone in on a reflector why cant someone take a picture of the dune buggy or the flag?
You can't see the reflector, you have to use coordinates from the mission. You'll know if you hit it or not based the return strength.
If they had enough sense to put up a reflector, why wouldn't they put a camera pointing at the earth. The moon is a very stable satellite. We should put some equipment, functional scientific equipment up there.
I guess hine sights 2020.
An actually sane question. Welcome to pixel resolution.
https://poal.co/s/FlatEarthers/438688
Now ask yourself why the great researchers of flat earth have remedial science questions on things which are easily explained and been known since the events occurred?
It's almost as if people don't know science and never actually research anything.
It’s not necessary to have a reflector on the moon to detect reflected lasers from it, as it as done as early as 1966 to measure the supposed distance to moon. This is what the link to an old Nat Geo article you didn’t read explained.
I still absolutely don’t believe that you did this “experiment” but even if you did, it was in a supervised setting where the Texas sharpshooter fallacy was used to create the illusion — you certainly didn’t see a reflector to know it was there. Even if it were there, you supposedly believe in lunar rovers and space probes, so it wouldn’t by any means prove that astronauts placed it there.
But I’m glad you admitted that you actually believe that is a real space ship, which hilariously disqualifies you from even debating the shape of the earth.
But I’m glad you admitted that you actually believe that this is a real space ship, which hilariously disqualifies you from even debating the shape of the earth.
So tell me where did you train in aerospace engineering? Physics? Engineering in general? How would you design it? What parameters are needed to be taken into account?
My qualifications for declaring that “lunar excursion module” an embarrassingly bad fake prop made of cardboard, foil, and curtain rods are as follows:
not legally blind
graduated fourth grade
Then why if you miss the location of the reflector does the laser not return as strong as hitting the "alleged " locations?
You’re just asserting that. Unless you can show that you’ve done the work, it’s just an assertion and you’re just a gobshite.
Again, even if you showed this happening, it wouldn’t prove that men walked, played golf, and drove stupid dune buggies on the moon during the Vietnam War.
(post is archived)